Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
He lists four “corrupt methodologies” (relegating Jesus to the back closet, proof-texting, turning writers into technical theologians, and dishonest translations/reference works); which of the four did you recognize in your own habits most clearly, and what would it practically look like to repent of that methodology in how you read Scripture this month?
Another way to ask: Which of the four “bad methods” did you see most in your own Bible reading habits, and what is one practical way you could change that this month?

Direct Answer Bercot’s main corrective is to stop reading in fragments (proof-texting) and instead start with Jesus and give “equal weight” to everything the New Testament says, refusing to shove inconvenient passages “under the rug.” Repentance would look like reading broadly (even in one sitting) and letting Jesus set the framework for interpreting Paul.

Support from Transcript:

  • He defines proof-texting: “picking and choosing verses… and ignoring a bunch of other verses that don’t fit.”
  • He admits how normal it felt: “The Bible was… a collection of proof texts.”
  • He learned a different approach: “You’ve got to read the whole thing… take the whole New Testament.”
  • He urges a practical step: the included disk has “all… scriptures… pertaining to salvation,” and he urges reading them “at one sitting.”
  • He insists: “You give full weight to every verse… You don’t shove anything in the closet.”
  • Method order: “start with Jesus Christ, and… read His disciples in the light of what He has taught.”
Discussion Follow-ups Which “closet passages” (like John 15’s warnings) do you tend to avoid? What would change if your group committed to reading all NT salvation passages without ranking some as more “gospel” than others?