Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 3

He lists four “corrupt methodologies” (relegating Jesus, proof-texting, turning NT writers into theologians with specialized terms, and biased translations/reference works); which of the four did you feel most accused by, and what would change in your Bible reading this week if you treated that methodology as spiritually dangerous?

Another way to ask: Of Bercot’s four bad Bible-reading habits, which one felt most like you? If you treated it as spiritually harmful, what would you do differently in your Bible reading this week?

Direct Answer Bercot’s strongest repeated warning is against sidelining Jesus and proof-texting, and treating either as spiritually dangerous would push you to read “the whole New Testament” starting with Jesus, giving “equal weight” to every passage instead of building a formula from favorite verses.

Support from Transcript:

Method #1: “relegating the teachings of Jesus to the back closet… we have to go to Paul.”
Method #2: “proof texting… picking and choosing verses… and ignoring… verses that don’t fit.”
He says he grew up viewing the Bible as “a collection of proof texts,” and later realized “you’ve got to read the whole thing.”
He urges reading “all… scriptures… pertaining to salvation… at one sitting… to get a feel for the totality.”
He says you “start with Jesus Christ, and you read His disciples in the light of what He has taught,” never making Jesus “subservient” to Paul.

Discussion Follow-ups If you stopped proof-texting this week, what passage would you read in full that you usually quote in fragments? What would it look like to begin your salvation thinking with John 15 or the Sermon on the Mount rather than Romans?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 3 of 10