Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 1

When David Bercot says “much of the essence of Christianity is intrinsically involved in how we harmonize Paul and James” and even frames it as “the gospel of Jesus versus the gospel of man,” what specific “gospels of man” did you recognize from your own background, and what would it cost you socially or spiritually to reject them?

Another way to ask: When Bercot talks about “gospels of man,” what false version of the gospel did you pick up in your past? What would you lose socially or spiritually if you stopped believing it?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, the “gospels of man” are man-made systems that don’t require an ongoing obedient love-faith relationship with Jesus, and rejecting them may bring accusations of heresy or “works salvation.” Spiritually, he implies the cost of not rejecting them could be losing the real gospel Jesus taught.

Support from Transcript:

He says the issue “boils down to… the gospel of Jesus versus the gospel of man.”
He lists systems he calls alternatives to Jesus’ gospel: “Christo-Judaism” (Jesus plus Mosaic law), “sacramentalism,” “meritism,” “goodism,” “Old Orderism,” and evangelical “easy believerism.”
He summarizes Jesus’ gospel as “maintain an obedient, love, faith relationship with Him.”
He warns that if you “dare to believe what Jesus taught,” evangelicals may say “you aren’t saved… you’re preaching a work salvation.”
He adds even conservative Anabaptists might level the same accusations.

Discussion Follow-ups Which voices (commentaries, church culture, friends) most pressure you to keep a system instead of abiding in Christ? What relationships would be strained if you started preaching what Jesus taught plainly?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 1 of 10