Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 7
When Bercot quotes Cyprian—“He who is freed owes obedience to his deliverer”—he connects ransom imagery to a debt of allegiance: “We are owned by Jesus… our total obedience is owed to Him”; how does that confront modern assumptions about Christian “freedom,” personal autonomy, and the idea that obedience is optional but salvation is secure?
Another way to ask: If being rescued means you now owe loyalty and obedience to your rescuer, how does that challenge ideas about Christian “freedom,” doing whatever you want, and thinking obedience is optional if salvation is secure?

Direct Answer Bercot’s ransom framing confronts the idea that salvation can be separated from obedience: if Christ “purchased” and “ransomed” us, then we belong to Him and owe Him allegiance. The transcript’s logic pushes against treating Christian freedom as autonomy, or obedience as a nonessential “extra.”

Support from Transcript:

  • Cyprian’s quote: “He who is freed owes obedience to his deliverer,” which Bercot says matched how captives and slaves thought in that world.
  • He explains: if someone paid your ransom, “you are obligated to that person,” not free to say, “thanks… now I’m going on my way.”
  • He draws the conclusion: “we now are slaves of Christ. We are owned by Jesus. Our allegiance, our total obedience is owed to Him.”
  • He ties it to redemption language: Galatians 1:3–4 says Christ gave Himself to “deliver us from this present evil age.”
  • He quotes Acts 20:28: the church is what Christ “purchased with His own blood,” supporting the idea of belonging.
  • He earlier emphasizes conditional forgiveness (Matthew 18), which reinforces that ongoing behavior matters inside the relationship.
Discussion Follow-ups If we belong to Christ by purchase, what would “freedom” mean—freedom from Satan’s bondage, or freedom to do what we want? How would this affect how you disciple new believers?