Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Salvation: Mechanical or Relational?  /  Atonement Part 1: What Early Christians Believed  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 1
David Bercot says the satisfaction/penal model “dates back no further than the 11th century” and that Anselm wrote *Why Did God Become Man?* “explicitly to criticize the historic view… and to replace the original model”; what does that claim do to the way you instinctively treat “the gospel” language you grew up with, and what kinds of evidence would you need to either accept or reject his historical framing?
Another way to ask: If the “penal/satisfaction” view only started in the 1000s, how does that change the way you hear the “gospel” words you grew up with? What proof would you need to believe or doubt Bercot’s history claim?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, his claim should make you hold your inherited “gospel” vocabulary more cautiously—treating it as a later explanatory model, not automatically as “what Christians have always believed.” To accept or reject his historical framing, you’d need to check whether earlier Christian sources and Scripture itself line up more with Anselm’s satisfaction/penal logic or with what Bercot calls the “classic” model.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says the satisfaction/penal model “dates back no further than the 11th century” and was developed by Anselm, who “wrote the book explicitly to criticize the historic view… and to replace the original model.”
  • He notes most “Bible-believing Christians think… [it] is what Christians have always believed,” but says he changed his mind after reading “the early Christian writings.”
  • He says the Reformers “adopted wholesale” Anselm’s view, modifying it into “legal or penal terms” (wrath poured out, blood appeased anger).
  • He repeatedly appeals to Scripture to test models (e.g., Matthew 18; ransom passages; Hebrews; James 4:8; 2 Corinthians 5:19).
  • He supports the early Christian view by quoting multiple early writers (Origen, Irenaeus, Cyprian, etc.).
Discussion Follow-ups What weight should Scripture have versus historical consensus in judging an atonement model? Also, how would you distinguish “biblical truth” (Christ died for our sins) from later “explanatory frameworks”?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next