Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 3
The speaker insists “works of the law” means “ritualistic, dietary, and hygienic requirements” (circumcision, Sabbath, new moons, pork restrictions), not obedience to Christ’s commands. When you read Romans 3:20 with that definition, what lines in Romans suddenly read differently, and where do you still feel internal resistance to limiting “works” to the Mosaic boundary markers?
Another way to ask: If “works of the law” means things like circumcision, food rules, and Sabbath-keeping, what parts of Romans 3:20 (and nearby verses) sound different? Where do you still struggle with limiting “works” to those Jewish boundary rules?

Direct Answer With the speaker’s definition, Romans 3:20 stops sounding like a rejection of obedience and starts sounding like a rejection of relying on Mosaic identity-markers for justification. The transcript doesn’t list every Romans passage that “reads differently,” but it repeatedly contrasts “law vs. Christ” rather than “works vs. faith,” and it anticipates resistance because Luther has trained many readers to hear “works” as any obedience.

Support from Transcript:

  • Romans 3:20 is framed as simple: “No human can be justified by the works of the Mosaic law.”
  • The speaker defines “works of the law” as “ritualistic, dietary, and hygienic requirements… circumcision… Sabbath… new moons… not eating pork.”
  • He says these regulations “served its purpose” as temporary and “once Christ came, that purpose ended.”
  • He argues Luther made it mean “any kind of works, even obedience to Christ… works play no role in your salvation.”
  • He points back to Romans 2 language (“render to every man according to his works… eternal life… by perseverance in good work”) as evidence Paul can’t be anti-obedience.
Discussion Follow-ups If you still feel resistance, is it mainly from the word “works” itself being a “bad word,” as the speaker described from Protestant circles? How might Romans 2 reshape that instinct?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next