Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 3
The speaker says a baptized Christian should be able to say, “Yes, I have been saved… there should not be any question about that”; what assumptions about assurance, faith, and God’s promise are being challenged here within Anabaptist life (including the “I hope to be” mindset he attributes to some Amish)?
Another way to ask: Why does he think a baptized Christian should confidently say, “Yes, I have been saved”? What beliefs about assurance, faith, and God’s promise does this challenge in Anabaptist life, including the Amish “I hope to be” mindset?

Direct Answer He challenges the assumption that salvation can only be spoken of as future (“I hope to be”), insisting Scripture speaks of salvation in past tense for true believers. He is pushing Anabaptists to embrace real assurance grounded in God’s saving act, without denying the need to persevere.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says some Amish reportedly answer “Have you been saved?” with “Well, I hope to be,” which he interprets as only seeing “the second phase of salvation.”
  • He insists: if we have “given our life to Christ… [and are] baptized Christian, we should be able to say, ‘Yes, I have been saved.’”
  • He argues the Bible uses “past, present, and future” tenses for salvation and cites “For by grace you have been saved” (past) as normal Christian experience.
  • He quotes 2 Timothy 1:9 (“Who saved us”) and Titus (“Saved us through the washing of regeneration”) to underline certainty.
  • He maintains this assurance does not deny future perseverance: “But that’s not the end… That’s where Protestants stop.”
Discussion Follow-ups What keeps people from saying “I have been saved”—fear of presumption, or misunderstanding grace?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next