Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 1
The speaker insists Romans can be “simplified,” but warns that most churches simplify it into “we’re saved by faith alone; our works play no role”; what specific parts of Romans (and the New Testament) does he believe that slogan ignores, and why does he call that simplification “not honest”?
Another way to ask: Which parts of Romans and the rest of the New Testament does he think get ignored when people say, “We’re saved by faith alone, so works don’t matter”? Why does he say that kind of shortcut is “not honest”?

Direct Answer He says the “faith alone, works play no role” slogan ignores Romans passages that tie final judgment and “eternal life” to persevering obedience, along with the wider New Testament’s call to obey Christ. He calls it “not honest” because it cherry-picks a few proof texts (especially Romans 3–4) while skipping Romans 2 and other warnings.

Support from Transcript:

  • He critiques the simplified Protestant reading: “We’re saved by faith alone. Our works play no role in our salvation… And that’s not what Paul is saying.”
  • He insists on reading “the entire New Testament… [and] the entire book of Romans,” not “one verse or five verses.”
  • He highlights Romans 2: “God will render to every man according to his works… eternal life to those who by perseverance in doing good…” and says Paul “starts off” by making perseverance necessary.
  • He quotes Romans 6:16: slavery to “sin leading to death… obedience leading to righteousness,” contradicting “once saved, always saved.”
  • He says people “skip chapter two… briefly go in the introduction… then… chapter three and four,” calling it like quoting only “paragraph three” of a will.
Discussion Follow-ups What passages besides Romans 4 have you heard used as “stoppers,” and what happens when Romans 2 is put back into the conversation?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next