Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Romans Commentary Chapters 1-8  /  Romans 8:6-13 to Be Carnally Minded is Death  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 4
Chrysostom and others are used to show that “cannot be subject to the law of God” means “so long as he has a carnal mind”; how does the lesson’s use of examples (Paul, the thief on the cross, Manasseh, Nineveh, David, Peter, the immoral Corinthian) reshape how you think about repentance, change, and the possibility of restoration?
Another way to ask: How do the lesson’s examples (Paul, the thief on the cross, Manasseh, Nineveh, David, Peter, and the Corinthian sinner) change how you think about real repentance and lasting change? Do they affect how hopeful you are about someone being restored after serious sin?

Direct Answer The lesson uses these examples to show that Paul’s statement is not fatalistic: a wicked person can truly change, repent, and be restored. The real impossibility is trying to remain wicked while also being subject to God.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot clarifies: Paul does not mean a carnally-minded person “can never change,” but “so long as he has a carnal mind, he cannot be subject to the law of God.”
  • Chrisostom (as cited): “What hope of salvation would there be left if it were impossible for one who is bad to later become good?”
  • Examples given to prove change is possible: “Paul himself,” “the thief on the cross,” “King Manasseh,” “the Ninevites.”
  • Additional restoration examples: “How would David have recovered…? How would Peter…after the denial?”
  • Church discipline/restoration implied: “the Corinthian man who had lived in immorality… restored to Christ’s fold.”
Discussion Follow-ups How do these examples shape how you treat serious sin in the church—either with naïve assurance or with hopeless condemnation?

Jumpstarter 4 of 10
Back Questions Next