Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Romans Commentary Chapters 1-8  /  Romans 8:31-34 If God is for US Who Can Be Against US  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 3
Tertullian’s lines—“We conquer in dying” and “The blood of Christians is seed”—assume that apparent defeat can be real victory. What kinds of “victory” does modern Christianity tend to demand that would make those early-Christian statements sound unrealistic or even irresponsible?
Another way to ask: Tertullian says Christians “conquer in dying” and that martyrdom spreads the faith. What kinds of “winning” do Christians today expect that make ideas like that seem unrealistic or reckless?

Direct Answer The lesson implies early Christians defined victory as faithfulness and the unstoppable growth of God’s kingdom—even through death—so modern demands for victory that always looks like safety, survival, or visible success would clash with Tertullian’s mindset.

Support from Transcript:

  • Tertullian is quoted: “We conquer in dying, we go forth victorious at the very time we are subdued.”
  • He adds growth through suffering: “The more often you cut us down, the more in number we grow. The blood of Christians is seed.”
  • Bercot explains Paul isn’t denying enemies; believers are “often kill[ed],” but enemies “will never defeat the kingdom of God.”
  • Jesus is quoted to reframe loss: “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do.”
  • Mark Felix describes Christians “scorn crosses and tortures,” implying they did not treat escaping suffering as the definition of victory.
Discussion Follow-ups Where have we equated God being “for us” with being protected from major loss?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next