Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 7
The lesson warns that “too many Christians read this verse…without noticing what God has predestined,” arguing it is the way God will bless believers—“to be conformed to the image of His Son”; how does that reframe “predestination” from a debate about who gets in to a promise about what God will do to those who follow Christ?
Another way to ask: How does it change the meaning of “predestination” if it’s mainly about God shaping believers to be like Jesus, instead of mainly about who gets saved?

Direct Answer Bercot reframes predestination as God’s predetermined plan for believers’ transformation—being conformed to Christ—rather than an arbitrary decision about which individuals will be saved regardless of their faith and obedience.

Support from Transcript:

  • He cautions: “Too many Christians read this verse…without noticing what God has predestined.”
  • He points to the text: God “predestined [those He foreknew] to be conformed to the image of his son.”
  • Bercot explains this as “the way He wishes to bless those who believe.”
  • He connects it with resurrection transformation: “He will transform our lowly body to be conformed to the body of His glory,” with the “full transformation…in the resurrection.”
  • He concludes God has predestined that followers of Christ “will be blessed by becoming brothers to Christ” and “join Him in being resurrected…to eternal life.”
Discussion Follow-ups If predestination is mainly about conformity to Christ, how should that shape what you expect God to do in your character now and in the resurrection later?