Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 5
Origen says salvation is promised yet still “something hoped for,” and that “these things…are often attained only through much affliction”; how does that early-Christian assumption about affliction confront popular ideas that suffering is mainly a sign something is wrong with your faith?
Another way to ask: If salvation is still something we hope for and is often reached through suffering, how does that challenge the idea that suffering always means your faith is failing?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, early Christians assumed affliction is often part of the normal path to receiving the promised salvation, not automatic evidence of weak faith. That confronts the idea that suffering mainly proves you are doing Christianity wrong, because Romans 8 ties hope, patience, and affliction together.

Support from Transcript:

  • Origen: “salvation has been promised to us,” yet it is “still something hoped for, not something seen.”
  • Origen adds: because the promised things are “so great and glorious,” they are “often attained only through much affliction.”
  • Paul and Barnabas are cited: “We must enter the kingdom of God through many afflictions.”
  • Theodoret: don’t be cast down by “present distresses,” since believers were not given “false promises,” but must “wait a while” before enjoying the good things.
  • Bercot emphasizes that hope concerns what we “do not see,” and therefore we “wait…with patience.”
Discussion Follow-ups How might your view of “strong faith” change if you expect affliction as a common route to glory? What kinds of suffering tempt you most to assume God is displeased?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10
Back Questions Next