Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 9
Chrysostom says the Spirit “bears witness” by the very words He commanded us to use in prayer, and Ambrosiaster ties that witness to being led by the Spirit and living a holy life; how does this challenge modern ideas that the Spirit’s witness is mainly an inner feeling detached from obedience?
Another way to ask: If the Spirit’s “witness” is tied to praying the words He taught and to living a holy life, how does that challenge the idea that His witness is mainly just a feeling inside? What role should obedience play in knowing the Spirit is at work?

Direct Answer The transcript frames the Spirit’s witness as connected to the objective privilege and practice of adoption—crying “Abba, Father”—and to a Spirit-led holy life, not merely a detached inner sensation. This challenges approaches that treat assurance as a feeling that can exist alongside persistent disobedience.

Support from Transcript:

  • Romans 8:16: “The Spirit itself bears witness with our spirit that we are the children of God.”
  • Chrysostom: since it is the highest being who testifies, “how can there be any doubt,” and he bears witness “by the very words He commanded us to use in prayer.”
  • Those words are adoption-language: “Abba, Father,” a privilege Jesus modeled, and Paul says we can use it intimately.
  • Ambrosiaster: when we “are led by the Spirit” and thus “living a holy life,” the Spirit dwells in us and “constantly bears witness” of our relationship.
  • Earlier, the transcript warns the status can be lost if one is not “afterwards desirous to be led by the Spirit.”
Discussion Follow-ups If the Spirit’s witness is tied to a holy life, what should we say to someone who claims strong assurance but refuses repentance?