Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Romans Commentary Chapters 1-8  /  Romans 6:8-15 We Must Not Let Sin Rule Over US  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 4
Bercot says Paul “adroitly transitions” from governmental authority to love; what might Paul be implying about the relationship between submitting/rendering what is due and the “debt of love” that “never ends”?
Another way to ask: Paul moves from obeying the government to talking about love. What might he be saying about how “paying what you owe” connects to the never-ending debt of love?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, Paul implies that Christians do have real, definable obligations to authorities (like taxes and honor), but those obligations sit under a deeper, permanent obligation—love—which continues after all civic “debts” are paid.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says Paul moves “from the topic of governmental authorities to the subject of love,” implying a deliberate connection.
  • He interprets “owe no one anything” as still about “owing taxes and honor to the governing authorities.”
  • Then Paul introduces the one lasting obligation: “The debt of love that we owe to one another never ends.”
  • The Apostolic Constitutions hold both together: render taxes/honor, yet “owe nothing to anyone except the debt of love.”
  • Chrysostom’s language supports the contrast: love is “a continuous debt,” one Paul “does not wish…ever to be paid off.”
Discussion Follow-ups Do we treat civic obligations as optional but love as central—or do we reverse that? How might paying what is due (taxes, honor) become one practical expression of loving our neighbor and keeping a clear conscience?

Jumpstarter 4 of 10
Back Questions Next