Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 1

Paul says “owe no one anything but to love one another,” and Bercot notes that early Christians did not read this as a prohibition against borrowing money; what does that early-Christian reading suggest about how they handled questions of money, debt, and “plain meaning” compared to many modern Christians?

Another way to ask: Paul says “owe no one anything but love,” but early Christians didn’t think that banned borrowing money. What does that say about how they thought about money, debt, and the “plain meaning” of Scripture compared to many Christians today?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, the early Christians didn’t treat Paul’s sentence as an isolated “plain meaning” rule about borrowing; they read it in its immediate context about paying what is due to authorities, and then focused on the one debt that always remains—love.

Support from Transcript:

Bercot notes that “some Christians today think…Christians should never borrow money,” but says “none of the early Christians interpreted Paul’s words in that manner.”
He emphasizes “that is not his context,” because Paul is “still referring to owing taxes and honor to the governing authorities.”
He says the connection is “even more obvious in the Greek,” linking *ophilo* (owe) to *opheile* used in the previous verse.
He cites the Apostolic Constitutions applying it to “taxes and honor”: “Render…offerings, customs, honor, gifts, and taxes…owe nothing to anyone except the debt of love.”
Paul then shifts to love as the lasting obligation: “The debt of love that we owe to one another never ends.”

Discussion Follow-ups What habits help us keep Paul’s words tied to context instead of turning them into stand-alone slogans? Where do we tend to force Scripture into modern debates (like borrowing) without checking how early Christians heard it?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 1 of 10