Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 6

“In honor, give preference to one another” is explained as deferring to another’s viewpoint or way of doing things; where do you most resist deferring (home, church decisions, politics, ministry methods), and how do you discern when deference is humility versus when it becomes compromise or cowardice?

Another way to ask: Where do you most resist letting others lead or choosing their way (at home, church, politics, ministry methods)? How can you tell when giving in is true humility and when it’s wrong compromise or fear?

Direct Answer The transcript defines giving preference as willingly deferring to others to show honor and humility, not insisting on our own way. It doesn’t spell out every limit, but it suggests discernment comes from humility, mutual submission, and a clear rejection of evil—so deference shouldn’t mean celebrating or cooperating with what is evil.

Support from Transcript:

Romans 12:10: “In honor, give preference to one another.”
The teacher explains: “willing to defer to another’s point of view or another’s way of doing things.”
Purpose: “Preferring others is part of showing honor… and maintaining a humble opinion of ourselves.”
Jesus’ principle: “Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted” (Luke 14:11).
Peter: “be submissive to one another and be clothed with humility” (1 Pet. 5:5).
A boundary implied elsewhere: we must “abhor what is evil” and not rejoice with the world “over the triumph of evil.”

Discussion Follow-ups When you defer, are you doing it out of love and honor, or out of fear of people? How can a church practice mutual submission while still abhorring evil and clinging to what is good?

Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 6 of 10