Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 7
Tertullian calls repentance “the price at which the Lord has determined to award pardon” and says God “tests our repentance” like a merchant examining a coin; what reactions does that transactional imagery provoke, and how does it confront modern assumptions about assurance and the timing of forgiveness?
Another way to ask: How do you feel about repentance being described like a “price” for pardon and God “testing” it like a coin? How does that challenge modern ideas about being sure you’re forgiven and when forgiveness happens?

Direct Answer The transcript’s “price” and “coin-testing” imagery pushes readers to take repentance seriously as something God evaluates before granting pardon, challenging assumptions that forgiveness is automatic regardless of the reality of one’s conversion.

Support from Transcript:

  • Tertullian: “Repentance is the price at which the Lord has determined to award pardon.”
  • He compares God’s scrutiny to merchants examining a coin for being “cut, scraped, or counterfeit,” saying the Lord “first tests our repentance” when granting “eternal life.”
  • Bercot’s broader point: grace does not mean we “keep living in sin after receiving God’s initial pardon.”
  • He stresses repentance is more than acknowledging sin; it is being “genuinely repentant” and committed to holiness.
  • Clement adds that without believing obedience matters (“salvation belongs to the one who lives according to the commandments”), “he will not reform,” implying assurance is tied to real reform.
Discussion Follow-ups The transcript doesn’t map out a full theory of timing, but it confronts “easy assurance” by insisting God looks for non-counterfeit repentance before treating someone as truly pardoned.

Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Back Questions Next