Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 1
David Bercot insists Romans 5:12 makes only three “simple statements of fact” and “sets forth no fixed doctrine about original sin”; what specific doctrines or assumptions do you personally hear in your head when you read Romans 5:12, and what would it take to actually read the verse as Paul states it without importing a system?
Another way to ask: When you read Romans 5:12, what beliefs about “original sin” do you automatically assume? What would help you read the verse as it is, without adding your usual theological system?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, the “extra” ideas many of us hear in Romans 5:12 are conclusions like inherited guilt, total depravity, or a detailed “mechanism” of transmission—things Paul does not state in the verse. To read it as Paul states it, Bercot says we must consciously “wipe the slates” clean and stick to Paul’s three factual assertions only.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot warns that most readers “rarely hear Paul's actual words” but hear “their church's particular interpretation.”
  • He says we must “begin with a blank slate…look objectively at what Paul actually says, without reading anything into the text that he does not say.”
  • He reduces Romans 5:12 to three statements: “Sin entered the world through…Adam…Death entered through sin…Death has passed to all men because all have sinned.”
  • He insists: “He sets forth no fixed doctrine about original sin…makes no attempt to explain the mechanics.”
  • He later reinforces that “until Augustine…no one taught that we somehow inherit Adam’s guilt…charged or imputed…making them liable to eternal damnation.”
Discussion Follow-ups What specific “mechanics” (inheritance, imputation, inability) do you tend to assume are in the text? What practices could help your group separate Scripture from inherited interpretation?