Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 3
Chrysostom is quoted saying Paul shifts to “our manner of living” to prevent people from using faith “as grounds for spiritual laxity,” paraphrased as: “let us not sin anymore…to do so would be to make war with God”—where do you see modern Christianity subtly (or openly) making room for that “laxity,” and what would it look like to remove those permissions?
Another way to ask: Where do you see Christians today (quietly or openly) acting like faith gives them permission to be careless about sin, and what would need to change to stop that?

Direct Answer The transcript doesn’t list modern examples, but it implies laxity shows up wherever “faith” language is used to excuse continued sin; removing permissions would mean treating “let us have peace” as a real call to stop sinning and not return to the former life.

Support from Transcript:

  • Chrysostom is quoted: Paul turns to “our manner of living” so no one supposes faith teaching “provides grounds for spiritual laxity.”
  • The exhortation is interpreted ethically: “let us have peace…In other words, let us not sin anymore, nor go back to our former state.”
  • Chrysostom warns that returning to sin is “to make war with God.”
  • Theodoret’s concern is similar: without moral exhortation, the lax would argue “faith alone was sufficient” and would “neglect practical virtue.”
  • Bercot’s own framing supports “removing permissions”: peace is not “automatic” after initial salvation; it must be “maintained throughout our Christian life by our faithful walk with Christ.”
Discussion Follow-ups What teaching or counseling patterns in a church effectively signal, even unintentionally, that returning to sin doesn’t really break peace with God?