Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 7
Ambrosiaster says law-keepers may be “justified only in the present age” and would have “glory… before mankind,” while “the faithful have glory before God”; what is the unsettling implication about religious respectability and being “in good standing” outwardly, and how might that critique land on modern church life?
Another way to ask: If someone can look religious and be praised by people but still not have “glory before God,” what uncomfortable warning does that give about outward respectability? How might that message challenge modern church life?

Direct Answer The unsettling implication is that outward “in good standing” respectability can earn human approval without producing true standing before God, because God’s assessment is tied to faith (and what God sees in the heart) rather than merely law-keeping identity markers. In modern church life, this critiques relying on visible conformity for spiritual confidence.

Support from Transcript:

  • Ambrosiaster: it is “impossible for anyone to be justified before God by the works of the law.”
  • He defines “flesh” as circumcision and says Abraham “had already been justified before he was circumcised.”
  • Key contrast: “If Abraham were justified by the works of the law, he has glory, but not before God. His glory would be before mankind.”
  • “Those who keep the law are justified only in the present age,” meaning outward blamelessness can satisfy public standards.
  • “In contrast, the faithful have glory before God,” pointing to God’s deeper evaluation.
Discussion Follow-ups What counts as “glory before mankind” in your church culture—reputation, roles, visible rule-keeping? How do we cultivate the kind of faith that seeks God’s approval rather than social acceptance?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Back Questions Next