Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 7
The speaker challenges the modern definition of grace as strictly “unmerited favor,” arguing the Greek *charis* can be conditional and still be grace (e.g., “God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble”); how does that linguistic and theological claim confront the way you’ve been taught to guard grace from “conditions”?
Another way to ask: The speaker says grace (charis) can still be grace even when it has conditions, like God giving grace to the humble. How does that push back against the way you were taught to keep grace “free of conditions”?

Direct Answer The claim confronts the assumption that any condition destroys grace; the transcript argues *charis* means “favor or goodwill” and can still be a “gift” even when God chooses to give it to certain kinds of people (like the humble). This pushes readers to distinguish “not earned” from “not conditioned,” especially regarding repentance, humility, and perseverance.

Support from Transcript:

  • The speaker says many Christians have been told grace means “unmerited favor” and that if we “must first do something, then it is no longer grace.”
  • He argues this is “not the correct understanding” of *charis*, which “simply means favor or goodwill” and “can be either merited or unmerited.”
  • He adds *charis* can mean “a gift,” and gifts can be unconditional or “conditioned on the recipient possessing certain qualities or taking certain actions.”
  • Example given: “God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble,” showing grace given based on “behavior or inner qualities.”
  • He links this to salvation: initial salvation is a gift God gives to those who “have repented… and… come to faith in Christ,” and Titus is cited to show grace “instructing us” to live godly.
Discussion Follow-ups Where have you equated “conditions” with “earning,” and how does the transcript separate those ideas? If grace trains us, how should we talk about obedience without sounding like we deny grace?