Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 5
On Romans 3:23, Origen is quoted arguing “all have sinned” includes Mary, and “Christ alone is sinless”; what does this reveal about early Christian assumptions regarding human holiness, revered figures, and the absolute uniqueness of Christ—and what discomfort does it raise for modern Christians?
Another way to ask: Origen says “all have sinned” includes Mary and that only Christ is sinless. What does that show about how early Christians viewed holiness and honored people, and what feels uncomfortable about it today?

Direct Answer The transcript portrays early Christians as strongly committed to the universality of sin—making “no exceptions,” even for Mary—while reserving absolute sinlessness for Christ alone. This can discomfort modern Christians who are used to treating revered biblical figures as exceptions or who are uneasy with applying “all have sinned” so universally.

Support from Transcript:

  • The speaker emphasizes Romans 3:23’s key word: “all,” and says Paul “makes no exceptions.”
  • Origen is quoted directly applying “all have sinned” to Mary: “then Mary too was stumbled at that time,” reasoning that if “all have sinned…and are justified…then Mary too…”
  • Origen adds, “Of those who were without sin from the beginning…there cannot possibly be any,” reinforcing universal sinfulness.
  • Clement of Alexandria: “Christ alone is sinless.”
  • Tertullian: “To the Son of God alone was it reserved to persevere to the end without sin.”
Discussion Follow-ups What does it do to your view of salvation if even the most honored saints are included among those needing redemption? How might this emphasis protect Christ’s uniqueness—and where might it collide with traditions or sentimental assumptions about certain figures?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10
Back Questions Next