Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 1
Paul anticipates the Jewish objection, “That is not fair…It is not right for God to suddenly change things”; what does Paul’s response in Romans 3 suggest about God’s consistency—does God “change,” or do people misunderstand what God was doing all along with Abraham, Torah, and circumcision?
Another way to ask: In Romans 3, how does Paul answer the claim that God is being unfair by “changing the rules”? Does God actually change, or did people misunderstand what He was doing all along with Abraham, the Torah, and circumcision?

Direct Answer Based on The Historic Faith’s teaching, Romans 3 portrays God as consistent and faithful; the “change” is really the Jews’ misunderstanding of what God promised from the beginning, especially in Abraham’s promise that “all the nations” would be blessed.

Support from Transcript:

  • Paul frames the objection: Jews would say, “That is not fair…It is not right for God to suddenly change things,” since they had “the Mosaic Law and the covenant of circumcision.”
  • Paul’s main point in this dialogue: “God has not been unfair to the Jews in bestowing grace and salvation on the Gentiles.”
  • To “Will their unbelief make the faithfulness of God without effect?” Paul answers: “God forbid…Let God be true, but every man a liar.”
  • God is not unfaithful to Abraham because He promised: “In your seed, all the nations of the earth shall be blessed.”
  • The transcript adds that God “has not withdrawn… the invitation” to Jews who believe, even though “most Jews” were unbelieving.
Discussion Follow-ups If God’s plan always included “all nations,” how should that change the way we read Torah and circumcision—as ends in themselves, or as gifts within a larger promise?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next