Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 8
“Not the hearers of the law… but the doers… will be justified” is interpreted as final justification, not initial justification, and as a “judgment saturated with grace”; what do you think the lesson means by a merciful assessment of works, and where do you feel tension between “grace” and being “declared righteous based on how we have lived after being saved”?
Another way to ask: What do you think it means for final judgment to evaluate our works but still be full of grace? Where do you feel the pull between “grace” and being called righteous based on how you lived after being saved?

Direct Answer The lesson means Christ will truly evaluate our post-salvation lives, yet He will do so mercifully—taking account of human weakness and forgiving imperfections—so that the judgment is still “saturated with grace.” The tension the transcript acknowledges is that we are “declared righteous” according to lived obedience, but not on an absolute, flawless standard.

Support from Transcript:

  • “Not… our initial justification. Initial justification is by grace, apart from works.”
  • “As to our final justification… On Judgment Day, we will be declared righteous based on how we have lived after being saved.”
  • “This will still be a judgment saturated with grace.”
  • “If Christ judged us on an absolute basis, none of us would stand… Thankfully… a merciful, forgiving assessment.”
  • Reason: “fallen humans cannot obey God’s commandments perfectly.”
  • William Law: fallen people “can do their best, and this is the only perfection that God requires of us.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where do you personally resist the idea of final judgment “by works”—from fear of legalism, or from discomfort that grace trains and requires real obedience?