Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 9
The lesson reconciles “circumcision truly profits if you keep the law” with Galatians (“if you receive circumcision, Christ will profit you nothing”) by arguing Paul is protecting Jewish Christians’ freedom to remain Jewish while resisting forcing Gentiles into Moses—what early-Christian assumptions about unity, mission (“to the Jews I became as a Jew”), and cultural practices are operating here, and how does that confront modern instincts to standardize everyone’s discipleship culture?
Another way to ask: How does the lesson explain that circumcision can "profit" in Romans but not in Galatians? What does this show about early Christian unity, mission, and culture, and how does it challenge our desire to make everyone follow the same discipleship style?

Direct Answer Based on The Historic Faith’s teaching, early Christianity assumed unity in Christ could include different cultural practices: Jews could keep circumcision and many Mosaic customs without making them saving, while Gentiles must not be compelled into them; mission required flexibility to “gain” people.

Support from Transcript:

  • The teacher distinguishes audiences: Galatians addressed “Gentiles…listening to the Judaizers,” so circumcision would mean “turning to the law for salvation and denying the grace of Christ.”
  • In Romans, Paul is “diplomatically addressing Jewish Christians who wish to retain their Jewishness,” telling them “they do not have to discontinue circumcision.”
  • He cites Paul’s rule to Corinthians: if circumcised, “let him not become uncircumcised…if uncircumcision, let him not be circumcised.”
  • Acts example: “many thousands…among the Jews…have believed…zealous for the law,” and leaders urge Paul to show he “walk[s] orderly and keep[s] the law.”
  • Mission principle: “To the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain Jews.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where do modern churches treat one culture’s discipleship habits as mandatory for everyone, instead of distinguishing gospel requirements from optional practices?