Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 1
The teacher argues that Paul’s “opponent” in Romans 2 is not a Christian legalist but a fictional *unbelieving Jew*—what specific observations from Romans 2:17–24 and from Acts/Paul’s letters does he use to rule out Luther’s common reading, and what would change in Romans if Luther’s identification were correct?
Another way to ask: What details in Romans 2:17–24 and in Acts/Paul’s letters does the teacher use to show Paul is talking to an unbelieving Jew, not a Christian legalist? If Luther’s view were right, how would that change how we read Romans?

Direct Answer Based on The Historic Faith’s teaching, Paul’s opponent in Romans 2 is explicitly “a Jew” who boasts in the Mosaic law and circumcision, not a Christian arguing about “works righteousness.” If Luther’s identification were correct, the teacher argues Paul would undermine his own argument immediately, because Paul has just affirmed that works affect final destiny.

Support from Transcript:

  • Romans 2:17 is treated as decisive: “So Paul specifically identifies his opponent as a Jew.”
  • The opponent “boasts in his circumcision and in his keeping the minute regulations of the Mosaic Law,” which fits an unbelieving Jew, not a Christian “legalist.”
  • The teacher says Luther’s reading fails logically: “Paul has just stated…that our works are going to determine our final destiny. If Paul’s purpose…is to refute Christians…He has lost his case at the very outset.”
  • He appeals to Paul’s actual historical conflicts: “Where do we ever read…about Paul clashing with Christians who believe they must walk faithfully with Christ…? There are no such conflicts.”
  • Instead, Paul clashed with “the Judaizing Christians” about circumcision and Moses, which is a different dispute.
Discussion Follow-ups If Romans isn’t mainly aimed at “Christian legalists,” how does that reshape how we read Paul’s warnings about judgment “according to works”?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next