Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 5

Bercot says we “create God in our image,” projecting our “nitpicky rules and theological definitions” onto Him; using his Hooker quote (“God is no nit-picking theologian… but a courteous teacher”), what would need to change in how you imagine God responds to imperfect theology, and what would need to change in how you respond to other Christians’ imperfections?

Another way to ask: If we often imagine God as picky like we are, how would you picture God responding to someone with imperfect beliefs? How should that change how you respond to other Christians’ mistakes and weaknesses?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests we must stop imagining God as eager to disqualify people over imperfect precision and instead see Him as patient and focused on love and obedience; that should make us less harsh, less argumentative, and more charitable toward other Christians’ weaknesses.

Support from Transcript:

Bercot says we think we can “create God in our image” by treating “nitpicky rules and theological definitions” as the “essence of Christianity,” projecting our “Phariseism onto God.”
He says the God of the Bible “cares primarily about two things”: loving God wholeheartedly and loving our neighbor.
He quotes Richard Hooker: “God is no nit-picking theologian… but a courteous teacher, ready to adjust what… we say in error, and eager to make the most of what we do say correctly.”
He asks about Jesus: Did He “go around correcting people on theological definitions”? “No, he almost never brings it up” unless Pharisees tried to trap Him.
He warns against two extremes: watering down the gospel vs. being “factious or argumentative,” saying “neither extreme is acceptable.”

Discussion Follow-ups What kinds of mistakes do you assume God is most irritated by? How would your tone change if you believed Hooker’s description is true?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 5 of 10