Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Radical Christian Living  /  Gaining Victory Over Bitterness  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 3
Bercot argues that people who wrong you have actually “blessed” you by giving you an opportunity for reward, drawing on Francis of Assisi calling the betrayer “friend”; what view of God’s sovereignty and justice makes that possible, and what feels hardest (or even offensive) about reframing persecutors as “better friends” than your ordinary friends?
Another way to ask: Bercot says people who hurt you can actually “bless” you by giving you a chance for reward, like Francis of Assisi calling his betrayer “friend.” What would you have to believe about God’s control and justice for that to make sense, and what feels hardest or offensive about thinking that way?

Direct Answer Bercot’s point assumes God can turn injustice into a test that produces eternal reward when believers respond Christlike, so God’s justice ultimately outweighs present wrongs. What feels hardest is that it asks you to “delight” in an injury as an opportunity and to view enemies as “friends,” which clashes with our instinct for payback or self-protection.

Support from Transcript:

  • Step one: “those who wrong us have actually blessed us… [giving] an opportunity to gain an eternal reward.”
  • Francis of Assisi quote: Jesus “called His betrayer ‘friend’… Our friends then are all those who unjustly afflict upon us trials… We must love them greatly, for we will possess eternal life because of what they bring upon us.”
  • Bercot applies it to being shunned by Jehovah’s Witnesses and labeled an apostate; he says realizing this helped him “put away all bitterness.”
  • He grounds it in Jesus’ teaching: “Blessed are you when they revile… rejoice… for great is your reward in heaven.”
  • He contrasts normal kindness with enemy-love: “there’s no reward in heaven” for friend-kindness, so enemies give a unique chance for reward.
Discussion Follow-ups What part of calling persecutors “friends” feels most offensive: the emotional cost, the implied surrender of rights, or fear that forgiveness minimizes evil? How does Bercot distinguish forgiving from approving what they did?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next