Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Myth of Christian America  /  MCA (9 of 14): The Losers  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 9
Bercot says the revolution made neutrality impossible through required oaths and universal conscription; if faithfulness to Christ put you in a position where you could not sign the oath, could not fight, and would lose property or freedom, what would you actually do—and what does your honest answer reveal about what kingdom comes first for you?
Another way to ask: If following Jesus meant you couldn’t sign the oath, couldn’t fight, and might lose your home or freedom, what would you do? What does your answer show about which kingdom comes first for you?

Direct Answer The transcript doesn’t tell us what an individual today “should” choose in detail, but it forces the question Bercot raises: when the state demands ultimate loyalty, we reveal whether Christ’s kingdom or an earthly kingdom truly comes first. His framework points toward accepting loss rather than betraying Jesus’ commands.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says the Revolutionary Party required oaths of loyalty to the Revolution and renouncing loyalty to the King.
  • He says there was “universal conscription” into the militias, forcing men either to fight or flee.
  • If you fled, “your property would be confiscated”; if caught, you could be “flogged or imprisoned,” even “hung.”
  • He contrasts loyalists with “kingdom Christians” (Quakers, Moravians, Mennonites) who were “non-resistant” and whose kingdom was “the kingdom of God.”
  • He quotes Jesus: “no man can serve two masters,” and says except for kingdom Christians, most colonists showed “their politics came first.”
Discussion Follow-ups What do you fear losing most—security, reputation, property, freedom? How does that fear expose where your deepest allegiance lies?

Jumpstarter 9 of 10
Back Questions Next