Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 6

Jesus’ answer on taxes (“Render therefore to Caesar…”) is treated here as directly addressing taxes perceived as improper or unlawful; what would it look like for a disciple to obey Jesus’ command in a situation where the tax feels exploitative, and what inner attitudes (fear, resentment, pride, love of enemy) would have to be confronted?

Another way to ask: What would it look like to obey Jesus’ command to pay taxes when the tax feels unfair or greedy? What heart issues—like fear, anger, pride, or love for enemies—would you have to face?

Direct Answer In the transcript, obeying Jesus would mean paying the tax anyway—“Render…to Caesar”—while refusing retaliation, threats, or violence, and possibly pursuing only nonviolent, legal appeal as a matter of conscience. That obedience would confront resentment and pride and replace them with a posture of peace and respect toward authorities as God’s “ministers.”

Support from Transcript:

Jesus is quoted: “Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”
Bercot says Jesus answers taxes seen as “unlawful or improper”: “You pay Caesar what is Caesar’s.”
He allows limited room: “I’m not saying it’s wrong…to lodge a legal protest… I’ll leave that question open…Jesus never comments on that.”
He insists violence is forbidden: “to threaten…burn…beat…torture…That’s horrible. Christians don’t do things like that.”
He says Christians should view government agents as “God’s ministers,” giving “honor and respect,” not contempt.

Discussion Follow-ups What would it take for us to pay what we believe is unfair without becoming bitter—and to refuse the tools of intimidation even when we feel justified?

Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 6 of 10