Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
David Bercot warns that “a person can proof text history just like you can proof text the Bible”; where have you seen selective quoting used to create a “Christian America” narrative (or an anti-religious narrative), and what practices would help a Christian community stay committed to truth instead of agenda?
Another way to ask: Where have you seen people quote history in a selective way to push a “Christian America” story (or an anti-religion story)? What can a Christian community do to stay committed to truth instead of an agenda?

Direct Answer Bercot’s point is that both “Christian America” promoters and secular critics often cherry-pick founder quotes to sell an agenda, so Christians must commit to careful, contextual truth-seeking rather than grabbing convenient lines.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says you can “pick quotations here or there and make any of the Founding Fathers look like what you want them to be,” either “devout Christians” or “atheists or agnostics.”
  • He calls the manipulation “quite disgusting” and labels it “dishonesty on both sides,” including “Christian God and Country people” and “secular humanists.”
  • He notes many quotes are technically accurate, but “not representative” of the person’s full beliefs, or they reflect “what that person believed at one time… but their views changed years later.”
  • His practice: use these sources like a “concordance,” then “checked the footnote,” “looked up the whole document,” and “read the whole document” in context.
  • He laments that “nobody seemed to be very interested in what the actual truth was… truth didn’t matter to them.”
Discussion Follow-ups What habits would help your group “read the whole document” today? How do we detect when we’re using history the way people misuse Bible verses?