Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 5

He portrays many Presbyterians/Scots?Irish as resentful latecomers who disliked Quaker nonresistance, fair dealing with Indians, and Quaker political control. What do those resentments reveal about the kind of “Christianity” that seeks power and land first, and how might early Christians have interpreted that spirit?

Another way to ask: Bercot says many Presbyterians/Scots-Irish resented Quakers for nonviolence, fair treatment of Indians, and political control. What do those resentments show about a kind of “Christianity” that wants power and land first, and how might early Christians have viewed that attitude?

Direct Answer Bercot’s portrayal suggests a form of “Christianity” that prioritizes land, control, and self-interest over Jesus’ teachings about peace and fairness. The transcript implies early Christians—who lacked political power and emphasized obedience to Jesus—would have recognized that spirit as contrary to kingdom living.

Support from Transcript:

He says Presbyterians were “not… thankful” to Penn and came “with the chip on their shoulders.”
They resented that “the best farmland… had already been taken” by kingdom Christians, even though it wasn’t discrimination.
They resented Quaker control of government, though Presbyterians and fellow Calvinists controlled governments elsewhere.
They resented Quaker “non-resistance” and Penn’s insistence on paying Indians “a fair price” rather than taking land.
They pushed into Indian territory and had conflicts, showing impatience with Quaker restraints.
Later, these groups joined in taking over government and persecuting non-resistant Christians.

Discussion Follow-ups What happens to Christian witness when “my rights” and “my land” become the main goals? How can we tell when our politics is driven more by fear and resentment than by Christ?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 5 of 10