Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Myth of Christian America  /  MCA (1 of 14): In the Beginning  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 1
David Bercot says the conservative story of “Christian America” is untrue at every point except that America has moved away from biblical teachings in the last 50–60 years; what does that claim assume about God’s relationship to nations, and how does it challenge the way many Christians interpret national “setbacks” as God’s judgment?
Another way to ask: If the “Christian America” story is mostly false, what does that say about how God relates to whole nations? How does it challenge the idea that national problems are always God’s judgment?

Direct Answer Based on Bercot’s teaching, his claim assumes God does not have a special “favored nation” relationship with modern countries the way the myth imagines; instead, God’s true “nation” is the kingdom people spread through every nation. That challenges the habit of reading national setbacks as God judging “His Christian nation,” because Bercot argues a “Christian nation” is impossible until Christ returns.

Support from Transcript:

  • He summarizes the conservative myth: America was “God’s particularly favored nation… a new Israel,” and setbacks will continue “until we as a nation return to God.”
  • He says “every part” of that version is untrue “except” that America has “moved away from the Bible… in the past 50 or 60 years.”
  • He states plainly: “there is no such thing as a Christian nation,” and that’s why the idea is a myth.
  • He teaches the kingdom is not tied to any country: “Neither America nor England nor any other country can be equated to the kingdom of God.”
  • He distinguishes God’s ultimate control from kingdom identity: God permits Satan governance over “kingdoms of the world,” while God’s kingdom is “not of this world” and “cannot be mixed” with earthly states.
Discussion Follow-ups If setbacks aren’t proof that a nation was once “God’s nation,” what kinds of spiritual conclusions (if any) are still appropriate to draw from them?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next