Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Matthew: The Chief Gospel  /  Doubt to Devotion: Thomas's Tale (Matthew Chapter 10 Part 2)  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 4
Jesus’ call to Philip (and the others) is presented as immediate, with Bercot highlighting Jesus’ refusal to let someone first “bury my father”—what view of discipleship priorities and obedience does this assume, and what real-life “reasonable delays” do Christians today protect that the chapter quietly calls into question?
Another way to ask: If Jesus expected instant obedience, even over “reasonable” family duties, what does that say about discipleship priorities, and what delays do Christians today excuse that this story challenges?

Direct Answer The transcript assumes discipleship is an urgent, concrete obedience where Jesus’ call outranks even socially reasonable obligations; it challenges the modern habit of postponing obedience until life feels settled.

Support from Transcript:

  • Of Philip: “when Jesus said, ‘Follow me,’ he immediately left and followed Jesus.”
  • Bercot stresses the immediacy theme: “the thought is definitely that they instantly dropped whatever they were doing.”
  • He cites Jesus’ hard saying: when someone wanted to delay—“Let me first bury my father”—Jesus replied, “Let the dead bury the dead. You preach the kingdom of God.”
  • Bercot concludes, “He did expect people… to immediately respond” when given that special invitation.
  • The transcript treats “follow me” as life-reordering, not merely an internal belief or gradual add-on.
Discussion Follow-ups What “first I need to…” excuses do Christians treat as unquestionable—career steps, financial security, family expectations—when Jesus’ words suggest a different priority structure?

Jumpstarter 4 of 10
Back Questions Next