Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Patrick “never taught his converts to pray to saints” and used “saint” in its original sense for all godly Christians; what would change in your view of holiness, spiritual “tiers,” and Christian community if you truly treated ordinary obedient believers as the “saints”?
Another way to ask: If we called all faithful Christians “saints” like Patrick did, how would that change how you think about holiness and “levels” of spirituality? How might it change the way Christians treat each other?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, treating ordinary obedient believers as “saints” would flatten spiritual “tiers” and push a stronger sense of shared holiness and shared identity in Christ. It would shift the idea of “saint” from a special category of heroic figures to the normal calling of godly Christians.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot states, “Patrick never taught his converts to pray to saints.”
  • Patrick uses “saint” “in its original sense to apply to all godly Christians.”
  • Patrick’s own words: he wanted “to visit the brethren and to see the faces of the saints of my Lord,” linking “brethren” with “saints.”
  • The transcript emphasizes Patrick’s Christianity as “primitive,” where the focus is “an obedient love relationship with Christ,” implying holiness is tied to obedience and love, not special rank.
  • Nothing in Patrick’s writings (as presented) points to spiritual elites accessed through prayer; instead he called out “either to the Father or to Jesus.”
Discussion Follow-ups If the “saints” are simply faithful believers, how should that affect the way we honor older Christians, new believers, and unnoticed servants in the church?