Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 7

Lomond’s examples of Patrick’s Christlikeness highlight celibacy, lack of property, enemy-love toward kidnappers, and refusing to speak ill of Marcus who betrayed him; which of these is most uncomfortable for you, and what reasons do you give yourself for why it might not be necessary today?

Another way to ask: Patrick’s Christlike life includes celibacy, owning little, loving enemies, and not speaking badly about Marcus who betrayed him. Which of these bothers you most, and what excuses do you make for why it may not apply today?

Direct Answer The transcript doesn’t tell us which is most uncomfortable for any individual reader, but it clearly presents all four as concrete ways Patrick “walks… in the footsteps of Jesus.” A reasonable inference is that we often excuse ourselves by treating these traits as “special” to Patrick, even though Lomond presents them as straightforward Christlikeness.

Support from Transcript:

Lomond frames the list as direct parallels to Jesus: “To begin with… Jesus never married, neither has Patrick… Jesus had no house… neither does Patrick… practically no material possessions, neither does Patrick.”
Enemy-love is central: “Jesus loved and forgave his enemies, so is Patrick,” including the Irish who kidnapped him.
The kidnapping detail intensifies the point: “kidnapped… at sixteen… slave… for six years… he bore no hatred… responded without hesitation.”
Betrayal inside the church is included: “even his best friend betrayed him… Marcus,” yet “never heard Patrick say even one unkind word about Marcus.”
Patrick’s aim is costly devotion: “Now he prays that God will let him die in Ireland.”

Discussion Follow-ups Which of these examples do we tend to label as “optional” today, and why? What would change if we treated enemy-love and refusing to speak ill as basic discipleship rather than advanced spirituality?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 7 of 10