Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
The chapter opens with Patrick being mocked as “absolutely insane” for wanting to return to Ireland; what does this scene reveal about how God’s call can look to “nominal Christians,” and what kinds of obedience today would likely receive the same bony-finger treatment from churchgoing people?
Another way to ask: When people call Patrick “insane” for going back to Ireland, what does that show about how God’s call can look to churchgoers who only partly follow Him? What kinds of obedience today might get mocked by people in church?

Direct Answer The scene shows that to “nominal Christians,” a costly, dangerous calling can look like insanity and even like unloving behavior toward family. In this chapter, obedience that risks safety, comfort, reputation, or social stability is what gets mocked—especially when it doesn’t fit what “reasonable” church people expect.

Support from Transcript:

  • The village assumes Patrick is “a little crazy,” and people “shake their heads,” “whisper,” and point “bony fingers,” showing social shame from religious neighbors.
  • They “couldn't possibly understand why anyone would want to undertake such a dangerous mission,” implying they value safety over mission.
  • They accuse him of being heartless: “Imagine him treating his parents that way, not caring if he breaks their hearts.”
  • His friends ridicule evangelizing the Irish: “You'd have more success trying to convert a herd of cattle,” and they jeer, “You must be a little insane.”
  • The narrator contrasts Patrick’s transformation with their lack of change: “Patrick had been spiritually transformed… the people… had not… still… nominal Christians.”
Discussion Follow-ups What kinds of modern obedience look “insane” mainly because they cost us comfort? How can we tell the difference between reckless impulse and a real call like Patrick’s?