Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 4
He says pre-Nicene Christians took verses like John 14:28 (“the Father is greater than I”) and Matthew 24:36 (“the Father only”) at face value without “explaining them away,” and he quotes Irenaeus doing exactly that; what makes modern Christians instinctively feel the need to qualify those verses, and what might it cost us spiritually to avoid their plain sense?
Another way to ask: He says early Christians took verses like John 14:28 and Matthew 24:36 in a straightforward way instead of explaining them away. Why do many Christians today feel they must qualify those verses, and what might we lose spiritually by not letting them speak plainly?

Direct Answer Bercot implies modern Christians feel pressure to qualify those verses because we inherited post-Nicene expectations—especially Augustine-influenced Western theology—that treats hierarchy of order in the Trinity as suspect or heretical. Spiritually, avoiding the plain sense may train us to “explain away” Scripture to fit later systems, rather than receiving biblical language without embarrassment.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says before Nicaea Christians accepted those verses “on face value,” quoted them “frequently,” and saw “no theological problems.”
  • After Nicaea, writers didn’t quote them “without a discussion of ‘why they don’t mean what they seem to say.’”
  • He reads Irenaeus: the Father alone knows the day/hour, and “The Father is greater than I,” concluding the Father “excel[s] with respect to knowledge.”
  • He states that after Nicaea “no Orthodox Christian would make those kind of statements…for fear of being called a heretic.”
  • He connects this to Augustine: Western writers “obliterate any distinction in order,” making the early Christians sound heretical to later ears.
Discussion Follow-ups What happens to our trust in Scripture when we routinely feel we must defend God from what the text plainly says?