Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 9
The chapter argues that God gives eternal salvation “to those who work jointly with him,” illustrated by the athlete who asks Zeus for victory only if he has “prepared perfectly”; where does this image confront contemporary assumptions about grace, effort, and “fairness,” and what would be a Christian way to talk about “God expects us to do the things that are in our power to do—He will do the rest” without sliding into pride or despair?
Another way to ask: How does the athlete story challenge what we assume about grace, effort, and what feels “fair”? How can we say, “Do what you can and God will do the rest,” without becoming proud or hopeless?

Direct Answer The transcript confronts the idea that effort is optional by framing salvation as cooperation: we must do what we can with a good conscience, and then trust God to complete what we cannot—so effort is real, yet dependence on God remains.

Support from Transcript:

  • It states plainly: “God gives eternal salvation to those who work jointly with him in the attainment of intimacy and right conduct.”
  • It insists on real ability: “We have the power to avoid the things the commandments forbid…[and] to do the things that God commands.”
  • The athlete illustration prays for victory only “if I have prepared perfectly…then please give me the victory, as it is only fair.”
  • The Christian parallel is: if one has “blamelessly and with good conscience done all that he can do, all things will work to carry his salvation on to completion.”
  • Summary line: “God expects us to do the things that are in our power to do. He will do the rest.”
Discussion Follow-ups A transcript-grounded way to avoid pride is the repeated emphasis that completion comes from God’s working and strength; to avoid despair, it stresses that God supplies what is needed and honors a “holy choice,” not flawless self-sufficiency.