Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
The chapter claims that loving God is “the small tribute of gratitude” we owe for existence itself, and that “we gain immortality by the very fact of our loving the Father”; how does that connect God’s gifts, our response, and eternal life in a way that challenges common evangelical instincts about grace and “owing nothing”?
Another way to ask: If loving God is a “thank you” we owe for being alive, and it leads to immortality, how does that connect God’s gifts, our love, and eternal life? How does that challenge the idea that grace means we “owe nothing”?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, God gives us everything—existence, benefits, and prior love—and our fitting response is love and gratitude; he even connects loving God with “gaining immortality,” which challenges the instinct to say we “owe nothing” in response to grace.

Support from Transcript:

  • God is “our Father… the One who has brought all things into being,” and “we receive our existence through Him.”
  • “He has loved us beforehand,” so our response is not initiating but answering.
  • He calls love “only the small tribute of gratitude… for the great benefits God gives us.”
  • He says he “cannot imagine any other way to repay God, who needs nothing and is perfect.”
  • Strong claim: “Yet we gain immortality by the very fact of our loving the Father to the fullest extent of our might and power.”
  • Love is tied to nearness: “The more we love God, the more we enter within God.”
Discussion Follow-ups If love is the “tribute” God asks, what does that imply about a faith that claims grace but withholds the heart? How might “owing nothing” become an excuse for lovelessness?