Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 4
The Moravian Lenape at Jenaiden Hutton are described as embracing “all of Jesus’ teachings,” laying down weapons, adopting a quiet agricultural life, and staying neutral as “Kingdom Christians”; what early-Christian assumptions about discipleship and war does this story mirror, and where do those assumptions collide with modern evangelical ideas of patriotism and “defending our rights”?
Another way to ask: The Moravian Lenape chose to follow Jesus, lay down weapons, and stay neutral. What does their story teach about discipleship and war, and where does that clash with modern Christian patriotism and “defending our rights”?

Direct Answer The transcript mirrors an early-Christian-like assumption that faithful discipleship includes renouncing violence and living as “Kingdom Christians” rather than taking sides in national wars; this collides with modern ideas that Christians must fight to defend rights and national causes.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says Moravian missionaries converted Lenape Indians who “embraced all of Jesus’ teachings, forever laying down their tomahawks and bows.”
  • Their village adopted “a quiet agricultural life, renouncing war,” showing discipleship expressed in nonviolence.
  • He explicitly calls them “non-resistant, peaceful Indians” and later records them claiming they were “non-resistant Christians.”
  • He says: “As Kingdom Christians, these Indians remained neutral during the American Revolution,” implying their primary loyalty was to Christ’s Kingdom, not to either side.
  • Their non-participation brought suspicion and danger from both sides—Indian allies of Britain doubted them, and colonial militia later killed them—showing how nonresistance conflicts with wartime patriot expectations.
Discussion Follow-ups If “Kingdom Christian” neutrality looks like disloyalty in a national crisis, how should believers prepare to be misunderstood? What would “laying down the bow” look like in modern political talk?