Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 4
In the long quotation from 1 Peter 2:11–23, Christians are told to live as “sojourners and pilgrims,” submit to rulers “for the Lord’s sake,” and follow Jesus’ example of not reviling or threatening; how would early Christians, shaped by this text, have responded to taxation and perceived injustice, and why?
Another way to ask: Based on 1 Peter 2:11–23, how do you think early Christians would respond to unfair taxes or injustice, and why?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests early Christians would have responded by submitting to governmental ordinances (including taxes) and enduring perceived injustice without reviling or threats, because they saw themselves as pilgrims and trusted God’s judgment rather than taking matters into their own hands.

Support from Transcript:

  • Peter’s instruction is quoted: “submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake… Honor… fear God, honor the King.”
  • Christians are called “sojourners and pilgrims,” with “conduct honorable,” doing good to silence “ignorance of foolish men.”
  • Jesus’ example is emphasized: when reviled “He did not revile in return… when He suffered, He did not threaten, but committed Himself to Him who judges righteously.”
  • Bercot contrasts this with the revolutionaries who “trampled upon commandment after commandment of God” and “reviled and threatened.”
  • He notes their fear of what would happen if they “peacefully paid their taxes,” implying the Christian path was the opposite—obedient and non-anxious.
Discussion Follow-ups What would “committed Himself to Him who judges righteously” look like in modern disputes over unfair policies?