Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
How to Arrive at Truth Through Critical Thinking  /  Questions About Critical Thinking  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 10
David says he is strict about which church he joins, but willing to pray and do relief work with many professing Christians; he also says the Apostles’ Creed functioned for ~300 years as a unifying standard and that we’re “too dogmatic” about things we can’t be 100% sure of—what doctrines or lifestyle issues today would you personally demote to “secondary,” and which ones (if any) would you treat as church-fellowship dividing lines, and why?
Another way to ask: David is careful about which church he joins but still prays and serves with many Christians, and he says we should be less rigid about things we can’t be fully sure about. What beliefs or lifestyle issues would you treat as secondary today, and what (if any) would you make a reason to not join the same church, and why?

Direct Answer The transcript doesn’t give a detailed modern list of “secondary” vs “dividing-line” issues, but David’s framework is clear: treat as primary for unity what aligns with the early church’s long-standing basic confession (he highlights the Apostles’ Creed), be less dogmatic on issues where certainty is limited or where they don’t affect walking with Christ, and treat serious ongoing sin as a different category that can break fellowship.

Support from Transcript:

  • He distinguishes levels: strict about “which church I’m going to be willing to join,” but broader for “relief work… helping the poor… pray with as a brother or sister.”
  • He says early unity used what we call the “Apostles’ Creed” for “nearly 300 years,” and most Bible-believing Christians would hold it.
  • He claims many modern arguments would have been “secondary issues by the early Christians.”
  • He says the problem is being “too dogmatic about matters about which no one can be 100% certain, or that do not affect our walk with Christ.”
  • He adds a boundary: “If someone is living in serious sin, then that’s a totally different thing.”
  • He rejects ecumenism that ignores “serious Bible teachings… on theology and on lifestyle.”
Discussion Follow-ups Using David’s categories, what issues in your circle are treated as “primary” but may not belong there? How would you decide what affects “walk with Christ” versus what is mainly speculative?

Jumpstarter 10 of 10
Back Questions Done