Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 5
When Bercot describes being quoted out of context and thinking, “I said that? That doesn’t sound like me,” what does this reveal about how easily “truth” can be distorted without outright lying, and how should that change the way Christians repeat claims about teachers, authors, or entire traditions?
Another way to ask: How can someone twist the truth just by quoting you out of context, without lying? How should that change the way Christians repeat claims about teachers, authors, or whole traditions?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests distortion can happen simply by removing context, even when the words are technically “real,” which can make a person appear to mean something they did not mean. Christians should therefore be slow to repeat claims and should check the original context before using quotations against others.

Support from Transcript:

  • He names “quoting something out of context” as a fallacy he has discussed before.
  • He says it happens “all the time” with the Bible: taking “a verse and not paying attention to the context.”
  • He says he has been quoted out of context so that someone claims, “Oh, I’ve said such and such.”
  • His reaction shows how misleading it can be: “I said that? That doesn’t sound like me.”
  • He explains that sometimes the quote is real, but “the context was something very different in the way that you’re using it against me.”
  • He adds it may be accidental or intentional: “Sometimes it’s not dishonest, sometimes it is.”
Discussion Follow-ups What practices could your group adopt—like reading surrounding paragraphs or listening to full sermons—before sharing a claim about someone’s beliefs?