Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 1
David Bercot claims that “when it comes to knowledge about God, we have only one ultimate source, and that’s the Bible”; how does that statement reshape the authority you give to sermons, commentaries, study Bibles, and popular teachers in your own discipleship?
Another way to ask: If the Bible is the only final source for knowing God, how should that change how much you trust sermons, commentaries, study Bibles, and popular teachers in your own faith?

Direct Answer Bercot’s statement makes Scripture the final authority and demotes every other resource to a secondary role that must be tested by the biblical text itself. In discipleship, that means sermons and teachers are only “valuable” when they truly illuminate what Scripture says.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says, “when it comes to knowledge about God, we have only one ultimate source, and that’s the Bible.”
  • He adds that “sermons, commentaries, and other Bible aids are valuable only to the extent that they shine authentic light on the text of Scripture.”
  • The course will also address “how to accurately assess what is said about Scripture in sermons and books,” implying those sources can be wrong or misleading.
  • He frames critical thinking as “thinking honestly and analytically,” avoiding “biases and fallacies,” not just accepting what we’re told.
  • He warns that many people functionally follow the rule: “whatever my church says the Scripture means is right,” which undermines Scripture’s ultimate authority.
Discussion Follow-ups What practical habits would help you treat teachers as helps rather than masters (for example, checking claims against the text and context yourself)?