Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 4
Dean quotes Froude about using history like a “child’s box of letters” to spell any word we please; what are the most common ways modern Christians curate early church history to prove their movement is “the one true church,” and how does that temptation show up even in groups that claim to reject sectarianism?
Another way to ask: What are some common ways Christians cherry-pick early church history to “prove” their group is the one true church? How can that same habit show up even in groups that say they aren’t sectarian?

Direct Answer Dean suggests modern Christians often cherry-pick quotations, ignore other voices, and build a selective storyline that “our church goes all the way back to the apostles.” Even groups that deny sectarianism can still “act like it,” treating their interpretation as the only faithful one.

Support from Transcript:

  • Froude quote: history is like “a child’s box of letters… spell any word… pick out such letter as we want… say nothing about those who do not serve our purpose.”
  • Dean describes a common pattern: “everybody had like their version that their church goes all the way back down to the apostles.”
  • He critiques proof-texting history: “I see this guy said that… and they didn’t even read any of the other people.”
  • He calls “one true church” narratives “deadly,” tied to “sectarian passion.”
  • His Holdeman story: some churches “have a doctrine that they’re the one true church,” while others “say they’re not… but they sure do act like it.”
  • He connects this to heresy as division: “The word heresy… means a divider, a sectarian divider.”
Discussion Follow-ups What would honest engagement with the early church look like (reading broadly, not just “our” quotes)? Where do you see “acting like” the one true church in your own circles?