Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 3
He describes the “lagoon” (warm, cozy local world) versus the “whoa” moment of seeing the whole church; where have you seen people (or yourself) either idolize the lagoon or despise it, and how would “embrace our communities but appreciate we’re part of this bigger giant thing” change concrete church decisions?
Another way to ask: Where have you seen people (or yourself) either treat the local church like it’s everything or look down on it? How would remembering we’re part of the worldwide church change real choices your church makes?

Direct Answer Dean’s point is that we can idolize the “lagoon” by acting like our local group is the whole church, or despise it by chasing the “whoa” moment and losing commitment to real community. Embracing both would push churches to value local faithfulness while staying humble, connected, and less sectarian in decisions.

Support from Transcript:

  • Dean’s image: we live in a “lagoon… warm and cozy,” but seeing the whole church produces a “whoa… epiphany.”
  • He warns of imbalance: “There’s a tendency to lose your lagoon in the ‘whoa.’”
  • His goal: “embrace our communities, but appreciate we’re part of this bigger giant thing called the church.”
  • He ties this to “ownership” and honesty, implying local decisions should be made as members of a wider story, not isolated.
  • He describes practical fruit: this helps us avoid sectarianism and “be honest” about our own mistakes.
  • He frames the church as “congregational yet Catholic… autonomous yet accountable,” which shapes how local churches relate to others.
Discussion Follow-ups What decisions would change if your church stopped acting like it’s the “one true” expression? Where do you personally drift—toward comfort in the lagoon or chasing the ‘whoa’?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next