Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 7
The Novatianists argued the church cannot grant ecclesiastical forgiveness where Jesus said, “He who denies me before man, I will deny before my Father,” yet they still urged the lapsed to attend, repent, and hope for God’s mercy—how does that distinction between *God’s forgiveness* and *the church’s declaration of forgiveness* challenge modern assumptions about assurance, restoration, and leadership authority?
Another way to ask: If the Novatianists said only God can forgive those who denied Christ, but the church should still call them to repent and hope in mercy, how does that challenge how we think about being “restored,” feeling sure of forgiveness, and leaders’ authority?

Direct Answer The transcript challenges the modern tendency to treat church restoration as automatic proof of God’s forgiveness, because the Novatianists separated God’s final mercy from the church’s authority to declare forgiveness. They urged repentance and hope, but refused to speak beyond what they believed Jesus had authorized.

Support from Transcript:

  • Novatianists held the church should “never extend ecclesiastical forgiveness” for idolatry/major sin, viewed as “sin unto death.”
  • Bercot clarifies they did not bar people from attending: they did not say “Don’t ever let them back…,” and they “encouraged the lapsed to come to church, to repent, to pray for God’s mercy.”
  • They also did not claim God could never forgive: “That did not mean he didn’t think God could forgive them.”
  • Their key argument appeals to Jesus’ words: “He who denies me before man, I will deny before my Father… what right does the Church have” to declare forgiveness where Jesus spoke so strongly?
  • They allowed for God’s sovereignty: “If Jesus wants to extend extra mercy… wonderful. But Jesus… has the authority.”
Discussion Follow-ups What do we gain and lose when leaders speak confidently about someone being “restored”? How should churches balance hope for mercy with fear of presumption?