Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 4
Finny compared political and sports tribalism—people becoming “utterly convinced because of what they want to believe to be true”—to how Christians can approach biblical texts; what are concrete signs that you are “making anything to be true” in your interpretation of gender, authority, and church practice, and how can a group actually guard against that self-deception?
Another way to ask: What are some clear signs you’re twisting the Bible to fit what you already want on gender, authority, or church practices? What could your group do to help each other not fool yourselves?

Direct Answer A major sign is when your interpretation predictably lines up with what you already want—so you find yourself explaining away plain statements as “culture” or redefining terms to avoid uncomfortable conclusions. Finny suggests groups guard against this by slow, careful, line-by-line reading with humility, refusing to bend Scripture to fit the “world spirit.”

Support from Transcript:

  • He observes people “justify amazing things… because they want it to be true,” leading to “lose good judgment.”
  • Sports illustration: the same ball “on the line” is judged differently depending on team loyalty—people are “utterly convinced because of what they want to believe.”
  • He warns: “If you want something to be true, you can make anything to be true.”
  • His remedy is method and posture: “go through the Word of God very slowly, very carefully, verse by verse, line by line… let the Bible speak for itself.”
  • He calls for a “childlike… humble” attitude, not a proud one.
  • He critiques academic habits that “make things complicated and confusing,” celebrating “lack of meaning,” rather than receiving the author’s intent.
Discussion Follow-ups Finny doesn’t give step-by-step group rules, but he does imply process matters: slow reading, shared submission, and resisting “want-driven” conclusions. What would it look like to ask, as a group, “What do we want to be true here, and why?”