Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 8
Bercot highlights Jesus’ statements that the Kingdom is not centered on Jerusalem (“neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem”) and that it “does not come with observation… the Kingdom of God is within you”; what does this reveal about God’s kind of rule and where He locates His holiness, and how does it confront modern Christian fascination with holy land geography, end-times timelines, or visible power?
Another way to ask: If God’s Kingdom is not tied to Jerusalem and is “within you,” what does that say about how God rules and where His holiness is found? How does that challenge a Christian focus on holy land places, end-times charts, or visible power?

Direct Answer Bercot presents Jesus’ teaching as showing that God’s rule is spiritual, world-embracing, and inward—His holiness is not tied to a geographic capital or visible political display—so obsession with earthly Jerusalem, visible signs, and end-times spectacle misses the nature of the Kingdom.

Support from Transcript:

  • Jesus to the Samaritan woman: “the hour is coming when you will neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem worship the Father.”
  • Bercot contrasts dispensationalism: they imagine “earthly Jerusalem is going to be the center of worship again,” which he calls “absurd” for anyone who understands the kingdom.
  • He states plainly: “God’s kingdom has no earthly capital.”
  • Jesus to Pharisees: the kingdom “does not come with observation… ‘Look here’ or ‘Look there’… ‘the Kingdom of God is within you.’”
  • He describes the kingdom’s citizens as “interspersed among all nations,” not occupying one land like other kingdoms.
  • He argues fixation on earthly power comes from not grasping kingdom ethics and reality.
Discussion Follow-ups How might fascination with geography, timelines, and visible “proof” be a substitute for inward repentance and kingdom obedience? What practices would re-center attention on Christ’s present reign rather than outward signs?